Prev << Main >> Next
Saturday, November 06, 2004

Today at LuthorCorp I received a phone call from a dear friend who read my great post-election conniption and, just because she knew I needed it, did a spot-on imitation of Tucker Carlson on the night Jon Stewart appeared on Crossfire. "Why aren't you being foody tonight? You were supposed to be foody. Come on, be foody." Why, certainly.

It is a good thing that Gareth Blackstock, the mercurial and acid-tongued chef played by Lenny Henry on Chef!, is not my editor, or my site administrator. If he were, he would probably be shouting right now: "Several WEEKS ago I remember hearing promises for a recipe for paradise JELLY. Since no paradise jelly recipe has been forthcoming, I can only assumed it hasn't ARRIVED yet...don't think I don't mind giving bog-variety preserving lessons on your behalf. I mean, I only have NINETY covers to prepare in the next hour and a half. I was hoping that something would come up to pass the time!" Dear friends, I am sorry about that.

I have been Googling tonight for a history of paradise jelly, but so far all I've been able to come up with is a single recipe posted in several sites under two different handles. It sounds like somebody is plagiarizing somebody, but I'll let them fight it out for themselves. I first read about paradise jelly in Laurie Colwin's last novel, A Big Storm Knocked It Over. Because Mrs. Colwin was a fan of the 1943 Joy of Cooking, I decided to look at my own copy to see if it included a paradise jelly recipe, and indeed it did. I believe that the internet versions of this jelly sprung off from the Joy recipe, because the proportions are the same: 20 apples, 10 quinces, 2 quarts of cranberries. (The internet recipe also includes two vanilla beans, but I've never tried it this way.) Because fruit varies so much by weight, I interpret these measures as 10 pounds of apples, 5 pounds of quinces and two one-pound bags of cranberries. If you don't want to be stuck dealing with jar upon jar upon jar of jelly, you can certainly scale the measures down, but I would definitely use twice as many apples as quinces, and I would trust your own judgment on cranberries. If you like them, use more. If you're not a fan, use less.

Last year I found myself caught unawares by the fall fruit season. Nearly all of the fruit I bought ended up in a pie -- and don't think for one second that I'm not noodling around with a version of paradise pie, to be shared with you as soon as I get something that sings out make me, bake me, eat me up, yum -- but I never got the hang of making pie and jelly in a single weekend, and as a result, it was a paradise jellyless Christmas last year. Lloyd and my parents were too kind to chide me for this, but I knew they missed it. My parents missed it on their toast and Lloyd missed his open-face jelly sandwiches, which he created one weekend out of a slice of focaccia (another house standard, based on a Carol Field recipe that includes olive oil and white wine in the dough, and is one of the most delicious loaves of bread I know how to make), a thin layer of creme fraiche and a thick layer of paradise jelly. This year, I won't be lazy, or disaffected, or clueless. I'll remember that every step of this jelly is a gift, from the selection of which apples to use (the house Winesaps? Golden Russets? Baldwins? Northern Spies?), to delving into the crate of quinces at the farmer's market, getting my hands and nose covered with quince fuzz and my head filled with that honeyed perfume, to watching the apples and cranberries turn a vivid red in the preserving pot, to doing the dance of cooking everything together, to the moment where we pop the seal on the first jar and dip the spoon in, inhale, sigh in a way that seems a bit over the top for a mere jelly, taste it and realize that no, we weren't being over the top. This is jelly with something to say.

Paradise Jelly

Yield: at least 8 jars (I'll have to let you know when I'm done!)

10 pounds tart apples

5 pounds quinces

2 one-pound bags fresh cranberries

sugar (see instructions)

juice of 2 lemons

Wash the apples and quinces, but do not peel. Cut the blossoms from the quinces and cut into 4 pieces. Put in a preserving pan, add water just to cover, bring the fruit and water to a boil and boil until fruit is collapsing. Pour the mix into a jelly bag and let drain.

Cut the blossoms and stems from the apples and cut into 4-8 pieces. Put them into the preserving pan along with the cranberries, add water just to cover, boil as with the quinces and pour into a separate jelly bag. Let both bags drain overnight, or for at least 4 hours. Do not squeeze the jelly bags, no matter how much they look like they need squeezing, for squeezing will turn the juice cloudy.

The next day, measure the juice. For every cup of juice, measure 3/4 cup of sugar, if you like a more tart, cranberry-accented jelly or 1 cup if you like a sweeter, more quince-flavored jelly. Bring the juice to a boil, add the sugar and lemon juice, stir, skim and begin testing for a set after 10 minutes. (Most cookbooks recommend that you cook no more than 4 cups of juice at a time, because it is trickier to determine a set if you cook much more than that, but sometimes I like to live dangerously and cook 6 cups at a time. Born to be wild, c'est moi.)

Meanwhile, boil your jars and sterilize your lids. When you see your jelly has turned into jelly (either by the sheeting test, the plate test or the thermometer test), decant it into the sterilized jars, apply the lids and screwbands and return them to the canner. Process them for 10 minutes. Take them out, listen for the satisfying ping of the seals forming, and wait for the jelly to cool down enough for enthusiastic consumption of it.

When you're done, you will have jars and jars of the world's loveliest jelly to show for your efforts, but odds are you will also be sweaty and disheveled and more than a little tired. (Or, if you are smarter about this than I am, you can ask a canning-inclined friend if s/he has made any paradise jelly, and are there any jars left? No sweat, no dishevelment, and you still have some jelly to show for your efforts.) One of the nicest things you can do for yourself at this moment is to fix yourself a cup of tea and a little snack, maybe some cream crackers with some of the leftover jelly you have decanted into a clean glass or jar for immediate consumption, and settle down with a good book. I finally picked up a book I have been noticing, looking at and poring over since its publication in 2000, Sallie Tisdale's purely amazing The Best Thing I Ever Tasted: The Secret of Food. I like this book so well that I could quote the whole thing, but that would be a gross violation of Ms. Tisdale's copyright. Better that you go directly to your library and/or bookstore and peruse for yourself. In the meantime, I will share just one of the passages that sent me over the moon, one that addresses one of the noisiest bees in my bonnet, the degradation of language and meaning:

The individual is once again first and forward. The youth revolution first seen in the twenties, and its vibrant revival in the sixties and seventies, shrank in the eighties into something else. We call health "fitness" now. A minority of Americans eat healthy food and exercise regularly, but socioculturally this is the leading image of consumption and success. The constant presence of lean, mean, athletic and perpetually young white people in our shared images renders all the rest of us invisible. Wages fall, security drops away, the rich grow richer and the poor poorer, and at the same time -- and not coincidentally -- the image of happiness gets richer, leaner, younger, and farther and farther out of reach. We laugh at the bemused housewife of midcentury, caught between Betty Crocker and Betty Grable, but we are caught between teenage models and marathon-running CEOs, and we buy it, we buy it all the way.

Words like labor-saving, leisure, freedom and economical are early examples of a degradation of language forced by social change, something T.J. Jackson Lears calls the "collapse of meaning." For close to two hundred years, how things look has been becoming more important than how things are. Advertising offered less and less information and more and more messages of desire, more blurring between lies and truth -- shadows thrown and lights carefully cast to create false impressions. By the early twentieth century, slogns, jingles, free samples, and mascots were everywhere. Words like natural and homestyle appeared as new disinformation; in Waverley Root's phrase, these are the kind of words that deliberately "evoke but don't inform." Canned foods were a return to "home cooking," while raw and bulk foods were labelled "unwashed."

More recently, the words changed again. The food technology industry first co-opted natural, homemade and fresh from the natural-foods movement, and then corrupted their meaning by adding light and low. In the 1980s, New York's Rainbow Room offered a "fitness" menu guaranteeing the diner fewer than 500 calories and a bill of more than $30. There is a trend in kitschy and old-fashioned cookbooks, a return to the past, but it is not what it seems. "The classics," says a food magazine, "lightened and reinterpreted, are reappearing." Endless recipes are "reinterpreted" and "refined" and "intensified" and especially "lightened." Lightened, buoyant foods of flight, foods of the rarefied, the few...Food and Wine recently interviewed Ferdinand Metz, the president of the Culinary Institute of America and one of the keepers of the highest culinary standards in this country. Metz says he eats only super-low-fat, light food. He recommends making a souffle with skim milk and substituting cornstarch for the eggs. Other cooks, like those of the French Culinary Institute, offers similar recipes "favorable to your waistline," but they are changes that betray the meaning of souffle at least as much as calling frozen peas "fresh" betrays the meaning of fresh, the very meaning of peas.

Posted by Bakerina at 01:22 AM in incoherent ravings about food • (14) Comments • (0) Trackbacks

Very interesting passage from Sallie Tisdale. Speaking of language and meaning (yes I’m an ignoramus from Oz).... is “jelly” the same as our “jam”? Jelly to me is something with gelatine in it (Firm and wobbly in texture...sounds like me really....)...and dare I ask what a jelly bag is?

jenny on 11/06/04 at 06:26 AM  

She’s BAAAA-AAAA-CCCCCKK!!!  Look out world.  The Big Dog has picked up the ladle and returned to the kitchen.

Paradise Jelly and language and writing and the state of our relationship with food and words at the eve of 2004.

All is right in the world again.

mouse on 11/06/04 at 11:25 AM  

I am SO making some of that jelly. My pear tree didn’t produce very heavily this year (my fault, I think, for not pruning as I did the year before), so I only have 10 jars of pear-citrus marmalade. People will be beating down my door at Christmastime, and I need something to give them.

Oh, and most of it’s for me. Me me me me me. grin

Jamie on 11/06/04 at 11:47 AM  

Oh, my, that sounds wonderful. Now where is my only-used-once jelly bag… and how will I keep the cats off the kitchen counters overnight? (They are fascinated by the sound of anything dripping.)

Kimberly on 11/06/04 at 02:02 PM  

Jenny, Jenny, Jenny...said it before, will say it again.  You are not an ignoramus.  We’re just having that “two nations divided by a common language” moment.  smile A jelly bag is a bag made out of a fine weave, like muslin or fine cheesecloth or nylon mesh.  It is usually part of a kit that consists of the bag, a metal ring and three legs that screw into the ring.  You fit the bag around the ring, and thus the bag has a place to hang while the juice drips from the fruit.  As far as the jam vs. jelly definition goes:  in the U.S. jam and jelly are very similar; both are spreads for bread and cake, but jam is made by cooking fruit and sugar together into, uh, jam.  smile Jelly is jam made by cooking the fruit in water, straining it, and cooking it with sugar until it “jells”.  Jelly is clear, and usually much firmer than jam.  What you consider “jelly” in Australia (and in the UK) we call either “gelatin” or the most popular trademark name, “Jello.” I make them frequently, from fruit juice and sheet gelatin.  I call them jellies, but Lloyd calls them Jello.  smile

Kimberly, do you have the kind of cats you can shut in the bedroom with you without their peeing all over your rugs or falling asleep on your head?

Jamie, are you interested in bartering some of that pear-citrus marmalade for something from the PTMYB larder?

‘mouse...gosh, how many times can you make a girl blush in a single week?

Bakerina on 11/06/04 at 11:09 PM  

My despair at having never tasted paradise jelly is offset by the knowledge that someone else appreciates Lenny Henry’s brilliant work in “Chef,” the best show about cooking to have ever been produced.

Why the Food Network has not glommed onto “Chef” is beyond my feeble comprehension.

Steve on 11/07/04 at 01:04 AM  

Man, I don’t think I have the energy to make jelly quite yet, which is probably why I ended up with a lot of apple pie this year.

Now, where did you get your 1943 Joy of Cooking?  That is what my mom used to cook from and some of my absolute favorite things came out of that book, which are not in the more current editions.  And sadly, my mom’s copy fell apart some time ago, so I search…

A.K. on 11/07/04 at 02:41 PM  

like the cheshire cat, she is- talking me into the jelly, as i already have a real knack for creating things ‘firm and wobbly’ in texture (yes, it’s gravy!- don’t ask again.).

i, for one, know that how things are is much more important than how things look.  we are a dying breed tho, aren’t we?

goliard on 11/07/04 at 06:01 PM  

somehow this makes me think of sex… rig up that jellybag, baby, the viagra’s gonna hit my bloostream any minute!

orionoir on 11/07/04 at 06:01 PM  

Woo-hoo!  A Chef fan!  Steve, I’m with you.  I think the reason that the Food Network never tried getting the rights to Chef is because it would probably show up their current on-air talent.  (Oh, now, that was mean.)

Fear not, A.K., for I can help you.  I got mine from Kitchen Arts and Letters, a food-and-wine bookstore at which I have been happily shopping for years.  They have a staggering amount of wonderful books, and whatever they don’t have, they’ll special order and/or search for you.  And they are the smartest, nicest, most knowledgeable booksellers that I know.  I seem to remember when I bought my 1943 Joy that they had at least two more.  Their number is 212-876-5550.  Let me know if you have any luck!

Miz g, that gravy comment made me laugh out loud.  If you’d really like to try this jelly, I have a tailor-made tip:  For the love of all that is good and true, SCALE THE RECIPE DOWN.  I ended up having to cook all the fruit in three batches, and I knew that I wouldn’t have it in me to finish it off today.  In short, this is going to be two-day jelly.  That person who told you to start small-scale, listen to him.  (Am I right in guessing that it was a him? wink

(smiling, shaking head) Young orionoir, why am I not surprised?

Bakerina on 11/07/04 at 09:38 PM  

What do you know about making jelly on the barbecue?

I heard there’s a way to do it, that involves the BBQ, an open flame, and jelly-making ingredients, but every time I try it, I just burn the glass jar and well, the jelly spills all over the flame area and it’s a mess to clean.

Helllllp!

Pauly D on 11/08/04 at 04:08 PM  

I’ll trade you my ultimate Christmas CD mix, crafted by moi, for a jar of that there jelly smile

HG on 11/08/04 at 06:34 PM  

Jelly on the barbecue?  Pauly, say it isn’t so!

Well, okay, I guess you could do it.  But you’d need a pot big enough for the fruit juice and sugar to bubble up without boiling over.  We’re talking about fast-rising molten sugar.  If I were you, I’d get thee to Sur La Table or Williams-Sonoma and buy one of those big copper preserving pans.  They’re so expensive that your whole body will hurt when you go to pay for it, but hey, would you rather be scouring firebricked jelly off your grill?

If you’re trying to do it the challenging way, i.e. setting mason jars on the grill, well, then, dear Pauly, I’m afraid I cannot help you.  No one can help you.

HG, my love, you’re *on*.  smile

Bakerina on 11/08/04 at 06:39 PM  

Hey, Paradise Jelly fans
I first came across it in “Preserving in Today’s Kitchen” by Jeanne Lesem, a lovely book, that I finally purchased after takeing it out of teh library 3 times…
I too, searched for recipes…
And found a couple variations..
Difference both in the ratio of Apples to Quinces.
Btw, DO try the Vanilla Bean. I know it sounds weird, but its wonderful ! Big hit with friends and family..!
Also, theres an extra recipe in the above mentined book, which is, to take the pulp, and cook it down with some honey, for Paradise Butter : )
This tear, Im experimenting with using only Quinces, cause..Im too lazy to buy apples, and I got a ton of Quinces, with bad spots, from a Greenmarket Farmer, for a really reasonable price smile Anyway, I came on this blog, again, looking around for something on the Jelly.. I would also love to find the history of it. Best I came up with, for its name, is that Quince, is often thought of as the original Apple that Eve ate smile Nice to meet you etc, Im on the Upper West Side of Manhattan
and yes, scale way down unless you are up for a ton of jelly !
I have a pit simmering right now, so while it simmers, I thought Id look around : )

Merrick on 12/04/05 at 05:17 PM  
Page 1 of 1 pages

Name (required):

Email (required but not shown):

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Prev << Main >> Next